Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.28 seconds)

Priyal vs Union Public Service Commission (Upsc) on 9 December, 2025

The applicant, upon approaching the respondent's office, was informed that her admit card had not been issued due to a technical issue, and that the officials were unable to assist her at that stage. Thus, the allegation of negligence on the part of the applicant is baseless. The applicant had no conceivable advantage in leaving any portion of the form incomplete, particularly when Part III contained no information that could benefit her in any manner. 7.3 Learned counsel also contended that the respondent's reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Satish Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission (supra) is misplaced.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Viplove Sudan vs Union Public Service Commission (Upsc) on 9 December, 2025

The applicant, upon approaching the respondent's office, was informed that her admit card had not been issued due to a technical issue, and that the officials were unable to assist her at that stage. Thus, the allegation of negligence on the part of the applicant is baseless. The applicant had no conceivable advantage in leaving any portion of the form incomplete, particularly when Part III contained no information that could benefit her in any manner. 7.3 Learned counsel also contended that the respondent's reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Satish Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission (supra) is misplaced.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1