Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs M/S. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd on 16 July, 2007

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Opera Clothing on 13 March, 2015

Insofar as the judgment of this Court in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (supra) relied upon by the petitioners is concerned, this Court has considered a clause in the agreement which provided that the receipt issued by the bank to the parties shall be a complete discharge of the liabilities of the petitioners towards the respondents. The facts before this Court in the said matter were totally different. The said judgment does not assist the petitioners.
Bombay High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Branch Manager,The United India ... vs Rakesh Roshan, on 14 January, 2011

17. Relying on the decision rendered by the Apex Court reported in 2007 PLJR 1997 United India Insurance Company Vs. M/S Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd. relating to the decision the learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon where it was held that " transit means anything is supposed to be in transit until and unless it reaches to its destination for where it is being carried. It is also held that while interpreting the term of the policy, the Court should keep in views of the intension of the parties as well as the words used in the policy on reading of the clause and the coverage. The facts of the case is squarely covered in the aforesaid verdict of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Crown Consultants (P) Ltd. vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. on 31 May, 2011

(ii) In the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. [(2007) 7 SCC 101], the Court was mainly concerned with interpretation of the Institute Cargo Clause of a marine insurance policy. The issue was in respect of scope of the terms coverage and extended coverage with reference to the location of the insured goods where the peril affecting those goods occurred.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 14 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Supreme Securities Limited vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 27 January, 2010

18. Ld. counsel for plaintiff has also relied on Jitendra Kumar vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. (2003) 6 SCC 420, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., AIR 2007 SC 2556, Satyanarayan Jiwanram vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. II (2006) CPJ58 (NC) and National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. National Co-operative Consumer Federation of India Ltd. MANU/DE/0572/2009 and has contended that in case of ambiguity or doubt, contract is to be construed against the insurance company.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Limited vs Kuldeep Kumar & Another on 27 July, 2016

19. Further in United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., (2007) 7 SCC 101, the Apex Court has held that in case of interpretation of policy if two views are possible, then the one which favours the policy holder should be accepted as the same serves the purpose for which the policy is taken and would be in consonance with the object to be achieved for the lives assured and also the Courts, while interpreting the policy should keep in view the intention of the parties as well as the words used in the policy. If the intention ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:54:02 :::HCHP 5 of the parties subserves the expression used therein then the expression used in that context should be given its full and extended meaning.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs A.S. Moosani & Co. on 19 May, 2017

17. It was then contended by learned counsel for the appellant that in the instant case the insurance policy covered all risks from the point of loading at Jaipur till the final delivery and the appellant was only under a duty to ensure that goods were in a properly packed condition when they were handed over at Jaipur for transport by train. It was asserted that the appellant had done everything possible to ensure that the goods reached their destination in proper condition as the event that had occurred at Dharamnagar station was beyond their control. In order to buttress the contention that the goods were in transit till they reached their destination, viz. Agartala, learned counsel relied on Kilroy Thompson, Ltd. Vs. Perkins & Homer, Ltd.8 and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.9 It was argued that in the instant case the respondents have not led any evidence to prove negligence on the part of the appellant.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next