Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.62 seconds)

Jatin Bhupendra Shah vs Praj Industries Limited And Ors on 1 February, 2023

26) In light of the aforesaid legal position, a detail reference to the Judgments of the Gujarat High Court in Company Application No. 77 of 2014 and connected applications in the matter of Authorised Officer and Assistant General Manager Vs. Official Liquidator of Apoorva Laminates Private Ltd., and Star Chemicals (Bombay) Ltd Vs. Vitta Mazda Ltd. And Another 4, the judgments of Madras High Court in V.G.P. Finances Limited Vs. Neptune Inflatables Limited5, and Panjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Chetan K. Singh Vs. City Bank N.A. and Others6 , sought to be relied upon by Mr. Vaghela is not warranted. It would be suffice to note that those cases revolved around the question of validation of the disposal of the assets of the Company under Section 536 (2) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Bombay High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - N J Jamadar - Full Document

Jatin Bhupendra Shah vs Praj Industries Limited And Ors on 1 February, 2023

26) In light of the aforesaid legal position, a detail reference to the Judgments of the Gujarat High Court in Company Application No. 77 of 2014 and connected applications in the matter of Authorised Officer and Assistant General Manager Vs. Official Liquidator of Apoorva Laminates Private Ltd., and Star Chemicals (Bombay) Ltd Vs. Vitta Mazda Ltd. And Another 4, the judgments of Madras High Court in V.G.P. Finances Limited Vs. Neptune Inflatables Limited5, and Panjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Chetan K. Singh Vs. City Bank N.A. and Others6 , sought to be relied upon by Mr. Vaghela is not warranted. It would be suffice to note that those cases revolved around the question of validation of the disposal of the assets of the Company under Section 536 (2) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Bombay High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - N J Jamadar - Full Document

Indian Bank vs The Official Liquidator

Indian Bank, SAM Large Chennai Branch, rep. by its Assistant General Manager .. Applicant vs The Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras as the Provisional Liquidator of M/s.Arvind Remedies Limited, Corporate Bhavan, 2nd Floor, No.29, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. .. Respondent This application has been filed to condone the delay of 132 days in filing the form No.66 before the Office of respondent/Official Liquidator herein.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Quddhose - Full Document
1