Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Ravi Shankar Srivastava vs State Of Raj. And Ors. on 9 February, 2005

(Hari Shankar Bhardwaj vs . State Of Rajasthan & Ors.) on 5 January, 2016

In the case of Ravi Shankar Srivastava Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2005 (2) WLC (Raj.) 612, Single Bench of this High Court has held that sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Judges (Protection) Act empowers the State Government to take action against any person, who is or was a Judge. In that case also the petitioner was member of Revenue Board of Rajasthan and was discharging judicial functions. Allegations of acceptance of gratification was made against him and after conducting preliminary inquiry formal FIR was registered against him which was challenged by way of writ petition. In the facts and circumstances of that case, it was held that an inquiry can be initiated against a Judge also as per sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Judges (Protection) Act. It was also held that FIR cannot be said to be false and case is not such that if allegations in FIR are accepted at their face value, it does not disclose any cognizable offence and with these observations High Court refused to quash the FIR.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nisha Saxena vs State Education Departmentanr on 8 April, 2022

"In my opinion, an attempt has been made by the Government to grant an opportunity to those employees working in aided schools against aided posts, for which, the Government is providing funds and finance. This action of the Government is aimed at maintaining educational standards in the rural areas also. Further, appointments on aided posts is required to be made after following procedure laid down in the rules; but, appointments on management or other than aided posts, upon which, aided institutions are not following the procedure laid down in the rules for appointment, therefore, those employees cannot be treated at par with the employees working against the aided posts because, at the time of sanctioning funds and finance, there is rider imposed by the Government that appointment to the post shall be made while following the rules and qualifications for the said post shall also be considered at the time of providing appointment. In this view of the matter, if any, benefit is extended to those employees who are working in the aided schools against sanctioned aided posts, then such benefit cannot be claimed by other employees (Downloaded on 13/04/2022 at 09:05:34 PM) (21 of 21) [CW-18382/2011] who are working against management or other non-aided posts."
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Dhand - Full Document
1