Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.59 seconds)
Documents citing N. Eswaran vs State Bank Of India on 14 August, 2003

K.Sundararajan vs State Bank Of India on 14 August, 2012

4. The learned counsel would draw the attention of this Court to a decision rendered by a Division Bench of this Court reported in "N.Easwaran and another versus State Bank of India (rep. by its Chairman), Bombay and another" (2007) 4 LLN 469, wherein, the Division Bench has considered the identical plea of the employee of the respondent bank and held that the cut of date prescribed namely, 1.11.1993 has no nexus to the object to be achieved by the statute and the bank fails to satisfy twin tests of classificatin founded on intelligible differentia distinguishing between the set of persons grouped together from those who have been left out. The Division Bench has finally set aside the order passed by the learned single Judge disallowing the identical claim and directed the bank to pay pensionary benefits to those employees who retired prior to 1.11.1993. According to the learned counsel, the issue is squarely covered by the orders passed by the learned Division Bench and therefore, he would pray for allowing the writ petition.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Golam Jilani vs State Bank Of India & Ors on 10 August, 2018

The Hon'ble High Court of Madras at the time of deciding the case of N. Easwaran & Anr. (supra) took into consideration various decisions to arrive at the conclusion whether fixing up of cut off age for appointment in service as prescribed under unamended Rule 8(c) of the SBI Employees Pension Fund Rules is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A Sinha - Full Document
1