Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Pinki vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 12 September, 2011

Chanda Kunwar vs . The State Of Rajathan & Ors. on 10 October, 2014

The respondents namely, the Deputy Director, Medical and Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for giving her appointment on compassionate grounds on account of death of her mother-in-law in accordance with the Rules of 1996 and in terms of judgment in Smt. Pinki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) within a period of two months from today. No order as to costs.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Kothari - Full Document

Sunita Mann vs Delhi Police Through on 10 September, 2013

In Smt. Pinki vs. State of Rajasthan and Others (supra), the deceased employee had died along with his son Rattan Lal (husband of the petitioner) and daughter Kumari Seeta in a road mishap and was survived by only female members i.e. the mother of the deceased (aged about 80 years); wife of deceased (aged about 53 years); and the petitioner (aged about 25 years). In the instant case, the deceased employee is survived by another major son. Further, the term dependent had been differently defined to include a spouse, son, unmarried and widowed daughter, adopted son/adopted unmarried daughter legally adopted by the deceased government servant during his/her life time and who were wholly dependent on the deceased government servant at the time of his/her death. In the instant case, this definition as defined in respondents Standing Order 39 of 2009 is more restrictive and not as an eclectic. The Single Bench of Honble High Court of Rajasthan has observed as under:-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunita Mann vs Delhi Police on 29 February, 2012

3. The learned counsel for the applicant made a strong plea for re-consideration of the impugned action by the respondents in the light of Rajasthan High Courts judgment as referred to above as well as the averments made in this OA. All the conditions for the grant of compassionate appointment are present in the case of the applicant. The only lacuna is that the widow daughter-in-law has unwittingly not been included in the definition of dependent family member though in fact, she has indeed been dependent on the deceased employee and living as a member of his family.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Asha Bhoi vs Raj. Rajya Vidhyut Ut. Nigam, Ltd. & Ors on 21 May, 2013

In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner for providing her appointment on the post of Class IV employee or any other equivalent post on compassionate ground in the light of the aforesaid judgment of the co-ordinate Bench rendered in the case of Smt. Pinki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, reported in 2012 (1) WLC (Raj.) 431 and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month from the date of receiving certified copy of this order.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - G K Vyas - Full Document

Smt. Krishna Devi. vs . State Of Rajasthan & Anr. on 18 March, 2015

14. This Court while examining the scope of the definition of 'dependent' as set out in the Rules of 1996 in the case of Pinki (supra) held that the daughter-in-law is an integral part of in-laws family and the very term 'daughter-in-law' itself indicates that she is to be accepted as 'daughter' by in-laws. Thus, the term 'daughter' was considered to be wide enough to include and encompass in itself a 'daughter-in-law' as well. Ofcourse, in the said case, this Court was dealing with the case of a widowed daughter-in-law but the fact remains that it is the specific case set up in the writ petition that the petitioner's husband was unable to perform the duties of a Safai karamchari because he was suffering from Asthma. The purpose of treating a widowed daughter-in-law to be equivalent to a widowed daughter while granting compassionate appointment is 9 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5551/2008 Smt. Krishna Devi. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. that the family should not be left in a state of penury and for this reason, the widowed daughter-in-law was also held to be entitled for appointment in place of her mother-in-law so that she could become the bread earner of the family.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Smt Shanti Devi vs M/O Railways on 22 November, 2017

' 7, AS per the provisions of Clause III of the Master Circular referred herein above, son/daughter/widow/widower of the employees are eligible for appointment on compassionate grounds. Dealing with an identical situation, the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in the case of Smt. Pinki vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., (supra), has held that a daughter- in-law is an important part of in-laws family and she is required to take all care of household. The term "daughter-in-law" itself indicates that she is to be accepted as "daughter" by in-laws and as such for all purposes, the term "daughter" is wide enough to include "daughter-in-law". The argument of learned counsel for the respondents that applicant no. 2 being daughter-in-law of applicant no. 1 cannot be considered even a near relative, also does not find favour with this Tribunal. It is ridiculous to say that a daughter-in-law in the family is not a near relative. She being an integral part of the family is a dependent of a t servant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Geeta Naidu vs Union Of India on 6 August, 2015

In Smt. Pinki (supra), after death of deceased employee, the remaining family members were Smt. Suwa Devi (mother of deceased), Smt. Jimiya Devi (wife of the deceased and mother-in-law of the petitioner), Smt. Pinki (petitioner), Baby Krishna and Baby Rampriya (both daughters of the deceased petitioner). Thus, there were directly dependent members of the family of deceased employee as mother and wife of the deceased employee were there. Since there was no other surviving employable member in the family, the respondents were directed to consider the case of daughter-in-law for grant of compassionate appointment so that family of deceased Government employee does not suffer distress. However, in the present case, there is no surviving member of family of deceased employee who could be considered to be directly dependent upon the salary of the deceased employee, and therefore, likely to suffer distress on her death. Thus, compassionate appointment to the applicant will serve only her and no other directly dependent member of the family of deceased employee.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next