Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)

Sanju Turi And Others vs State Of Jharkhand & Others on 25 August, 2022

On the other hand, in the judgment rendered in the case of Mihir Kumar Jha Vs. The State of Bihar & Others (Supra), it has been laid down while quashing the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner cancelling the settlement of waste land with the petitioner of the aforesaid case as also the order passed by the Commissioner, on the ground that the settlement made by the Sub-divisional Officer is not against any of the mandatory provisions of the said Act. The interpretation of Section 28 has been made to the effect that the aforesaid provision does not in express term debar the authorities to make settlement of waste land with non-jamabandi raiyats.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Punulal Mahra & Another vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others on 11 March, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted, that the land, which has been settled to the petitioners is adjacent land to both the Mauza, though it situates in Mauza - Naya Chitkath, as such, in view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Patna High Court, in the case of Mihir Kumar Jha Vs. State of Bihar, reported in 1997 1 PLJR 716, they have a right for settlement.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - K P Deo - Full Document
1