Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (1.92 seconds)

Continental Engineering Corporation vs Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd on 10 January, 2022

In the present proceedings, initially, this Court vide Order dated 22nd Signature Not Verified NAMITA DHYANI OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 38/2021 Page 1 of 6 15.01.2022 12:39:12 February, 2021, directed the Judgment Debtor to file an affidavit in the format given in Annexure B-1 to the judgment dated 5th August, 2020 titled M/s Bhandari Engineers and Builders Private Limited v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture,1 [hereinafter, 'Bhandari Engineers'] along with all the necessary documents. The said direction was further reiterated by this Court on 25th February, 2021 and again on 18th May, 2021.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - S Narula - Full Document

Abhishek Vyas & Anr vs Amar Srivastava on 28 May, 2021

6. In the affidavits filed by the appellants, most of the columns have been left blank. The appellants have not complied with the directions given by this Court. The appellants are directed to file fresh affidavits of their assets and income in the format of Annexure A-1 to the judgment of Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture, 2020 (270) DLT 582 along with the documents within four weeks.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - J R Midha - Full Document

Ht Media Limited vs Brightstar Restaurants Private ... on 3 June, 2021

20. The Petitioner has submitted that the financial condition of Respondent No. l is also precarious and has heavy liabilities and is in the process of winding up its business operations in India. Furthermore, Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are relocating to the United States of America and are disposing of their personal assets. In view of the above, the Petitioner has established a prima facie case in its favour. The balance of convenience also lies in favour of the Petitioner and therefore if an injunction is not granted, the Petitioner is likely to suffer an irreparable loss. Accordingly, the Respondents are directed to file an affidavit and disclose their list of assets, both movable as well as immovable in terms of the decision of this Court in Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Ventures & Ors. 1, within a period of three weeks from today. Further, Respondent Nos.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Horizon Crest India Real Estate & Ors vs Vidur Bhardwaj & Ors on 16 August, 2021

However, Mr Sibal does not dispute that in the event this Court requires the respondent to disclose certain information, the respondent would be bound to do so. It is clarified that the directions issued to the respondents to file an affidavit as per the annexures in decision in M/s Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. (supra) was issued by this Court specifically to elicit certain information. Instead of setting out the details and the information required, this Court had directed that an affidavit be filed in terms of the annexures to said judgment.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Gail (India) Limited vs M/S Jewel Overseas Private Limited & Ors on 7 September, 2021

12. In addition to the above, it is noticed that the Respondent had been directed to file and affidavit of assets vide order dated 24th May, 2021. The directions for the affidavit were in terms of the judgment in Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Ventures 1 , which stands overruled by the Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. 2 . Therefore, it is now directed that the Respondents shall file an affidavit disclosing its assets in Form 16A, Appendix E under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The said affidavit shall be filed within a period of two weeks from today and would be placed before the learned Arbitrator. In the said affidavit, the Respondents shall also disclose the details of their bank accounts.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Mohan Investments And Properties ... vs Sai Aaina Farms Private Limited And Anr on 8 February, 2022

9. Though Ex Appl (OS) 1037/2021 seeks modification of the said direction, Mr. Kaul submits that modification has been sought only on the ground that the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Bhandari Engineers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture1 stands reversed by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Chemicals and Pharmaceutical Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd.2. He submits that the directions for furnishing affidavit of assets was never issued in terms of Bhandari Engineers1 but was issued independent thereof and under the provisions of CPC, and that the award debtors/judgment debtors are 1 227 (2016) DLT 302 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 127/2021 Page 2 of 3 Signing Date:10.02.2022 15:52:54 bound to comply therewith.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Krishan Kumar Wadhwa & Ors vs Arjun Som Dutt & Ors on 12 March, 2021

3. Mr. Bansal submits that the Judgement Debtors were required to file affidavits disclosing their assets, in terms of the decision in Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Ventures & Ors., Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:17.03.2021 11:07 MANU/DE/1497/2020 (hereinafter referred to as 'Bhandari-II'), and the same has not been done.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - S Narula - Full Document

Rasmala Trade Finance Fund vs Raman Gupta on 12 March, 2021

3. The judgment debtor is directed to file additional affidavit in terms of the formats provided in Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture, 2020 (270) DLT 582, along with the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAJENDER SINGH KARKI Signing Date:17.03.2021 10:09:30 documents mentioned therein (Annexure A-1 and Annexure B-1, in case the judgment debtor is the Director/Partner of any company) within 30 days.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J R Midha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next