Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 128 (3.21 seconds)
Documents citing Yogesh Tyagi And Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 31 May, 2018

State Of Haryana And Others vs Balwinder Singh And Others on 2 December, 2022

109. Learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions vide judgment dated 31.01.2020. It was held that respondents were correct in not regularizing their services as per notification dated 18.06.2014 keeping in view the judgment passed in Yogesh Tyagi (supra), however the petitioner was entitled for regularization as per policy dated 01.10.2003 alongwith all consequential benefits.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 3 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Shiv Kumar And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2025

21. A further reference is made to the separate reply that has been filed by the respondent-State of Haryana in CWP-7179-2021. It has been averred in the reply filed in the said writ petition that the direction issued by this Court on 03.08.2016 was only to the limited extent that services of the petitioners could not be dispensed with by replacing them with fresh contractual employees but there was no legal bar to dispense with the services of contractual employees if their work and conduct was found wanting. Further, such engagement could be discontinued on account of reduction of workload and it was open for the employer to disengage the contractual employee on account of Budgetary/Financial constraints to the employer even in the case of work being required. Reference is made to the judgment dated 31.05.2018 of the Division Bench passed in CWP-17206- 2014 titled as 'Yogesh Tyagi and another Vs. State of Haryana and others' to contend that the petitioners in any eventuality could not have been retained for a period of more than 06 months from the date of passing of the said judgment. Hence, the department was entitled to end the contractual 16 of 25 ::: Downloaded on - 01-03-2025 02:07:06 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:028308 17 213+219 CWP-38197-2018 (O&M) and 01 connected case engagement of the petitioners considering the eventualities referred above. An intimation in this regard was thus sent to the petitioners that they could not have been sent on deputation as they were not regular employees of the department and that their contract had been discontinued in view of the non- sanctioning of scheme which was a permissible contingency as per the order passed by the Learned Single Judge on 03.08.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagpal Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 9 August, 2022

[4] Learned counsel states that in the light of the position noted above, the petitioners would be satisfied, if the writ petition is disposed of qua aforementioned petitioners by directing the respondents to take a decision with regard to the claim of the petitioners in view of the decision in Yogesh Tyagi 's case, as well as decision dated 11.09.2018 of this Court in CWP No.10481 of 2016 in case titled as 'Tirloki and others versus State of Haryana and others'.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Monga - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs Punjab National Bank And Others on 30 November, 2023

14. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual 12 of 14 ::: Downloaded on - 04-12-2023 22:32:58 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:152546 2023:PHHC:152546 CWP-18839-2023 & Connected Cases -13- employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Bhatti vs Bank Of Baroda And Ors on 6 December, 2023

12. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balbir Raj vs Bhakra Beas Management Board And Ors on 24 January, 2024

10. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 12 of 14 ::: Downloaded on - 26-01-2024 04:15:44 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:009983 CWP-23925-2022 13 2024:PHHC:009983 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amrish Sharma & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 26 February, 2024

22. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure 62 of 95 ::: Downloaded on - 09-03-2024 03:56:34 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:026615 2024:PHHC:026615 CWP- 19238 of 2013 & connected cases -63- amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Board Of Governors, National Institute ... vs Mess Kalyan Employees Union And Anr on 6 September, 2024

30. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjeev Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 22 January, 2025

14. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.05.2018 in Yogesh Tyagi and another v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.17206 of 2014, set aside policy of regularization made by the State. The Court has set aside policy on the ground that regularization of contractual employees who have been appointed without following prescribed procedure 25 of 45 ::: Downloaded on - 29-01-2025 21:43:57 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:011927 ` CWP-10071-2022 & connected cases -26- amounts to back door entry and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16 & 309 of Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next