Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)
Sumit Singh S/O Shri Ummed Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:42620) on 17 October, 2025 cites

Praveen Yadav vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013

8. Considering that bail is an equality between the right of liberty; that "bail is a right and jail is an exception" as directed in the ratio encapsulated in State of Rajasthan v. Balchand @ Baliay: (1977) 4 SCC 308; that the applicants are young persons; that the co-accused is enlarged on bail by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Praveen Yadav (Supra); that the applicants have been in custody ever-since January 2025, and taking note of the overall facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, however, without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the bail applications of the (Uploaded on 17/10/2025 at 04:06:32 PM) (Downloaded on 23/10/2025 at 10:00:01 PM) [2025:RJ-JP:42654] (7 of 8) [CRLMB-6688/2025] accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail, subject to following conditions:-
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand @ Baliay on 20 September, 1977

8. Considering that bail is an equality between the right of liberty; that "bail is a right and jail is an exception" as directed in the ratio encapsulated in State of Rajasthan v. Balchand @ Baliay: (1977) 4 SCC 308; that the applicants are young persons; that the co-accused is enlarged on bail by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Praveen Yadav (Supra); that the applicants have been in custody ever-since January 2025, and taking note of the overall facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, however, without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the bail applications of the (Uploaded on 17/10/2025 at 04:06:32 PM) (Downloaded on 23/10/2025 at 10:00:01 PM) [2025:RJ-JP:42654] (7 of 8) [CRLMB-6688/2025] accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail, subject to following conditions:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 3729 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Jorawar Singh Shekhawat S/O Shri Mool ... vs Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur on 21 December, 2018

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and has relied upon the ratio encapsulated in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 9041/2025 titled as Jorawar Singh Meena Vs. State of Raj., wherein under similar facts, the bail application was dismissed. It is submitted that present are the cases of the organized crimes. It is also submitted that upon conviction a fine upto Rs. 1 crore and custody for a period of 5-10 years was imposed. Howsoever, it is fairly conceded that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicants.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - P Nandrajog - Full Document
1