Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.30 seconds)
Rajeshbhai @ Rajubhai @ Bav Jentibhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 7 October, 2022 cites

Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs State Of M.P on 1 May, 2002

(14) Judgments referred above support the case of respondents, except stating that on 05.03.2004 when the deceased went to the premises of first respondent, his parents who are respondent Nos. 2 and 3 addressed her as Page 45 of 55 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:32:43 IST 2022 R/SCR.A/632/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 07/10/2022 a call-girl. At the same time by applying the judgments referred above we are of the view that such material is not sufficient to proceed with the trial by framing charge of offence under Section 306/34 IPC. It is also clear from the material that there was no goading or solicitation or insinuation by any of the respondents to the victim to commit suicide.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 1297 - Full Document

Mahendra Singh And Anr., Gayatribai vs State Of M.P. on 7 February, 1995

10. This Court, considering the definition of 'abetment' under Section 107 I.P.C., found that the charge and Page 28 of 55 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:32:43 IST 2022 R/SCR.A/632/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 07/10/2022 conviction of the appellant for an offence under Section 306 is not sustainable merely on the allegation of harassment to the deceased. This Court further held that neither of the ingredients of abetment are attracted on the statement of the deceased.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 325 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr on 6 November, 1978

(16.) Reliance is placed on the judgment in the case of Union of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal (supra), where this Court has held that the Judge while considering the question of framing the charges has the undoubted power to sift and weigh the evidence for the limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case against the accused has been made out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 1736 - S M Ali - Full Document

Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009

"20. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal, 2010 AIR(SC) 512, after considering various earlier judgments in para 15 observed that, "15. Thus, this Court has consistently taken the view that before holding an accused guilty of an offence under Section 306 IPC, the Court must scrupulously examine the facts and circumstances of the case and also assess the evidence adduced before it in order to find out whether the cruelty and harassment meted out to the victim had left the victim with no other alternative but to put an end to her life. It is also to be borne in mind that in cases of alleged abetment of suicide there must be proof of direct or indirect acts of incitement to the commission of suicide. Merely on the allegation of harassment without their being any positive action Page 34 of 55 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:32:43 IST 2022 R/SCR.A/632/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 07/10/2022 proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused which led or compelled the person to commit suicide, conviction in terms of Section 306 IPC is not sustainable."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 556 - M Sharma - Full Document

State Of W.B vs Orilal Jaiswal on 23 September, 1993

In State of W. B. v. Orilal Jaiswal this Court has observed that the courts should be extremely careful in assessing the facts and circumstances of each case and the evidence adduced in the trial for the purpose of finding whether the cruelty meted out to the victim had in fact induced her to end the life by committing suicide. If it transpires to the court that a victim committing suicide was hypersensitive or ordinary petulance, discord and differences in domestic life quite common to the society to which the victim belongs and such petulance, discord and differences were not expected to induce a similarly circumstances individual in a given society to commit suicide, the conscience of the court should not be satisfied for basing a finding that the accused charged of abetting the offence of suicide should be found guilty."
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 456 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 Next