Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)
Purnendu Biswas vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 2 May, 2008 cites

T. Vijendradas & Another vs M. Subramanian & Others on 9 October, 2007

About effect of an order, which is outcome of exercising fraud in a subsequent proceeding, the Apex Court has answered the point by holding that the later proceeding also will be a nullity in terms of the judgment passed in the case T. Vijendradas vs. M. Subramanian, reported in (2007) 8 SCC 751. It is now proved that writ petitioner, Sri Sukhen Sarkar, exercised fraud upon the Court to appear in the interview and obtained an order by making the Court to believe that many junior candidates were sponsored being the order dated 22nd August, 2001 passed by Ashim Kumar Banerjee,J. Since the basis of the order is on false averment by making the Court to believe, the contention made in paragraph 7 as already quoted as real state of affairs, it goes to the root of the matter and accordingly his appearance in the interview and empanelment thereto, all have been vitiated and no relief could be granted to him by allowing his subsequent writ application seeking approval of the panel.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 64 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1