Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.17 seconds)
Umakant @ Anil Kumar vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 26 June, 2023 cites

State Of Karnataka vs M.V.Mahesh on 4 March, 2003

12. Reference may also be made to State of Karnataka v. M.V. Mahesh [(2003) 3 SCC 353 : 2003 SCC (Cri) 795] where this Court observed: (SCC p. 354, para 3) ―3. ... It is no doubt true that even in the absence of the corpus delicti it is possible to establish in an appropriate case commission of murder on appropriate material being made available to the court. In this case no such material is made available to the court.‖
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 44 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Karnail Singh on 14 August, 2003

-- quoted with approval by Arijit Pasayat, J. in State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh [(2003) 11 SCC 271 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 135] .) The law does not enjoin a duty on the prosecution to lead evidence of such character which is almost impossible to be led or at any rate extremely difficult to be led. The duty on the prosecution is to lead such evidence which it is capable of Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.A. Nos. 1163/2017 & 36/2018 Digitally Signed Page 31 of 36 By:JUSTICE MUKTA By:POONAM BAMBA GUPTA 2023:DHC:4296-DB leading, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. Here it is necessary to keep in mind Section 106 of the Evidence Act which says that when any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him. Illustration (b) appended to this section throws some light on the content and scope of this provision and it reads:
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 570 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1