Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)
Grid Corporation Of Orissa Ltd. vs Western Electricity Supply Company Of ... on 5 October, 2023 cites

Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 8 October, 2021

21. The learned counsel appearing for DISCOMS submitted that no substantial question of law is involved in Civil Appeal No.759 of 2007 and other connected matters filed by the Commission. He relied upon a decision of this Court in the case of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.1 and various other decisions of this Court. He submitted that no substantial question of law is involved in Civil Appeal No.759 of 2007. He urged that the Appellate Tribunal has not finally decided the issues raised in the appeal filed by DISCOMS against the revocation of the license order as the said order is specifically made subject to the decision in present appeals, which are pending before this Court. He 1 2022 (4) SCC 657 Civil Appeal No.414 of 2007 etc. Page 14 of 48 pointed out that the Commission requested GRIDCO to take appropriate steps towards recovery of the outstanding dues.
Supreme Court of India Cites 80 - Cited by 23 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Smt. Bismillah Begum (Dead) M By Lrs vs Rahmatullah Khan (Dead) By Lrs on 21 January, 1998

Kanhaiya Lal [(1999) 7 SCC 288: AIR 1999 SC 3325], Ramaswamy Kalingaryar v.Mathayan Padayachi [1992 Supp (1) SCC 712:AIR 1992 SC 115], Kehar Singh v. Yash Pal [AIR 1990 SC 2212] and Bismillah Begum v. Rahmatullah Khan [(1998) 2 SCC 226:AIR 1998 SC 970] should, however, suffice.” (Emphasis added) We may also note here that while issuing notice/admitting these appeals, this Court had not framed any substantial questions of law. Nevertheless, we have heard these appeals on merits, while keeping in view the provisions of Section 125 of the Electricity Act. The reason is that these appeals are very old, starting from the appeal of the year 2007.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 21 - M J Rao - Full Document

Ptc India Ltd vs Central Electricity Reg. Comm. ... on 15 March, 2010

24. The Commission exercises the power to fix tariffs conferred by Section 62 of the Electricity Act. We will have to note the nature of power exercised by the Commission while fixing the tariff under Section 62 of the Electricity Act. A Constitution Bench of this Court dealt with this issue in the case of PTC India Ltd. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission3. In paragraphs no.25 and 26, it is held thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 155 - Cited by 239 - S H Kapadia - Full Document
1