The State Of Telangana vs Habib Abdullah Jeelani & Ors on 6 January, 2017
Placing reliance upon the judgment
in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jeelani
reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779, it is submitted that the counsel
appearing for the State was not even supplied with the copy of the
petition then also an order not to take any coercive steps against
the petitioner was passed by this Court. It is argued that within
7
three days of registration of an FIR, the writ petition was filed.
Notices under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. dated 28.03.2022 and
30.03.2022 were issued to the petitioner for appearance along with
all the relevant documents with respect to the aforesaid complaint
for carrying out the proper investigation, but the petitioner has not
complied with aforesaid notices and has chosen to file a present
petition before this Court. He has not appeared before the
authorities at any point of time. Thus, on one hand the petitioner is
not cooperating with the investigation and on the other hand, he
has filed a petition directly before this Court under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India praying for quashment of FIR being not
maintainable.