Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.88 seconds)
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its ... vs Sunita Gajanan Shinde And Ors on 24 April, 2019 cites

New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs Bismillah Bai & Ors on 20 March, 2009

In the case of "New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors." [supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal principle that unless rash and negligent driving ::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 ::: 10 fa3532.18 of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident is proved, the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only because the vehicle is involved in the accident, the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation, unless it is shown that an accident was caused by rash and negligent act of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Premlata Shukla & Ors on 15 May, 2007

In the case of "New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors." [supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal principle that unless rash and negligent driving ::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 ::: 10 fa3532.18 of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident is proved, the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only because the vehicle is involved in the accident, the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation, unless it is shown that an accident was caused by rash and negligent act of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 437 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Lachoo Ram & Ors vs Himachal Road Transport Corpn on 28 January, 2014

In the case of "New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors." [supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal principle that unless rash and negligent driving ::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 ::: 10 fa3532.18 of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident is proved, the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only because the vehicle is involved in the accident, the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be held liable to pay compensation, unless it is shown that an accident was caused by rash and negligent act of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 50 - S K Singh - Full Document
1