Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)

Dr. Nutan Thakur vs State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of ... on 2 November, 2017

3. The brief facts of the case are that an F.I.R. was registered against one Yadav Singh and others vide case crime no. 371 of 2012 under sections 409, 420, 466, 467, 469, 471 and 120-B I.P.C. and 13 (1) (d) read with 13 (2) of the P.C. Act on 13.1.2012 at police station Sector 39 Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar U.P. for the alleged corrupt practices while executing engineering work between 14.12.2011 and 23.12.2011 in which agreement bonds of Rs. 954.38 crores were executed by Engineering Department of Noida. The investigation of the case was initially carried out by the local police but thereafter the same was entrusted on 3.11.2012 to C.B.C.I.D. which submitted final report on 13.1.2014 and on 27.11.2014, the final report was accepted by the Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Gautam Budh Nagar. On 16.7.2015, the Lucknow Bench of this Court has passed an order in Misc. Bench No. 12396 of 2014 (Dr. Nutan Thakur vs. State of U.P. & others) directing the C.B.I. to conduct investigate into all allegations of corruption and amassing of unaccounted money against ninth respondent ( in the said petition) Yadav Singh, the then Chief Engineer, Noida, Greater Noida and Yamuna Express Authorities and in regard to all transactions, persons and entities connected thereto.
Allahabad High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 14 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs Dr. Manmohan Singh And Anr on 31 January, 2012

10. The Apex Court in the case Subramanian Swamy v. Dr. Manmohan Singh, AIR 2012 SC 1185 has held that corruption in our country not only poses a grave danger to the concept of constitution governance, it also threaten the very foundation of Indian democracy and the rule of law. The magnitude of corruption in our public life incompatible with the concept of a socialist, secular, democratic republic. It cannot be disputed that where corruption begins all right ends. Corruption devalues human rights, chokes development and undermines justice, liberty, equality, fraternity which are the core values in our preamble vision. Therefore, the duty of the Court is that any anti-corruption law has to be interpreted and worked out in such a fashion as to strengthen the fight against corruption.
Supreme Court of India Cites 63 - Cited by 335 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1