Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)
Narendra Plastic Private Limited And ... vs Dbs Bank Limited on 28 February, 2017 cites

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs Smt.Nasibunnisa Mohd.Israr Khan And ... on 14 October, 2011

is concerned, it is the contention of the petitioners that not claiming the postal envelope cannot be considered to be a good service. Reliance is placed on the judgment in the matter of the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Nasibunnisa Mohd.Israr Khan & Ors in C.A. No.1979/2011 in First Appeal Stamp No.13185/2011 delivered by a Single Judge of this Court on 14 th October, 2011.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 6 - A Oka - Full Document

C.C. Alavi Haji vs Palapetty Muhammed & Anr on 18 May, 2007

12 /17 os-wp-1338-16 and 2046-16.doc correctness of the address and has not disputed the service of summons on him. Defendant No.2 is the Director of the Company though he has not claimed the postal envelope since the address on the postal envelope is correct it has to be presumed that he has received the notice. The Counsel appearing for the respondent vehemently contends, placing reliance on the judgment in the matter of C.C. Alavi Haji vs. Palapetty Muhammed & Anr reported in (2007) 6 SCC 555 that Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 gives rise to a presumption that service of notice has been effected when it is sent to correct address by registered post.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 4985 - D K Jain - Full Document

Lucy Ayline Jacinto vs Union Bank Of India & Ors on 3 March, 2011

A reliance is also placed on a judgment of the Division Bench in the matter of Lucy Ayline Jacinto vs. Union Bank of India & Ors reported in 2011 (3) Mh.L.J.480. In the reported matter, as is evident from the judgment, it is observed in paragraph 14 that the Court cannot be unmindful of the circumstance that a fraud is alleged to have been perpetrated upon the first respondent by its then DGM Tawadia, who was at the material time, the Manager at the M.S.Marg Branch. The fraud pertains to the discounting of bills in favour of a proprietary concern. It was also observed by the Court that the address of the petitioner was totally different as such court proceeded to direct setting aside the ex parte decree.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1