Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.36 seconds)
Brahmaputra Metallics Limited vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief ... on 4 September, 2025 cites

Rajkumar Sahu vs State Of M.P. on 8 January, 2015

49. We have considered the judgment passed by the Special Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of "RajKumar Sahu V. State of M.P and Others" (supra) and found that exactly the similar thing has been taken into consideration of the conferment of power of the State of Madhya Pradesh to proceed for inflicting punishment in case of illegal transportation of the mining product.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nani Gopal Biswas vs The Municipality Of Howrah on 29 October, 1957

47. A co-ordinate Bench in W.P(C) No. 2604 of 2021 has also considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and, therefore, there is no reason to take contrary view, rather the said judgment is only applicable in a case where the State has decided to go to institute a criminal case as provided under section 21 of the Act of 1957, then in such circumstances certainly the District Mining Officer will have no jurisdiction of any other authority as referred in the Rule 2004 will have jurisdiction due to simple reason that reference as has been made under section 21 (4A) r/w sub-section (6) thereof wherein the Court has been conferred with a power to take cognizance which admittedly cannot be by the Executive Authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 21 - B P Sinha - Full Document
1