cites: 40685614 tag: rioting

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Azizul Hoque @ Batchu vs The State Of Assam on 11 August, 2023 cites

Sharifa Khatun @ Sarifa Bibi vs The State Of Assam on 8 January, 2020

45. As there is no eye-witness to the incident of killing of deceased Hasina Begum and as the prosecution case is entirely based on circumstantial evidence, following observation made by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in "Birdhichand Sarda -vs- State of Maharashtra" (supra) becomes very relevant in the instant case:-

Gauhati High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Raja Ram @ Raju And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 February, 2003

In the case of Raja Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (2005) 5 SCC 272, the Supreme Court has observed that prosecution witness who did not support the prosecution case and not declared hostile with the permission of the court, his evidence would be binding on the prosecution. Therefore, the evidence of PWs 5, 6 and 7, who did not support the prosecution story, would be binding on the prosecution."

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 46 - S K Keshote - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Sharifa Khatun @ Sarifa Bibi vs The State Of Assam on 8 January, 2020

Raja Ram @ Raju And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 February, 2003