J.K.M. Yacob Rowther Sons, ... vs Union Of India on 6 March, 1964
14. The Tribunal found that Ex.A-1 invoice contains specific condition printed on its bottom that the goods once sold cannot be taken back and that the responsibility of the first applicant ceases when the goods leave the first applicant's godown and in the circumstances, it should be considered that the first applicant consigned the goods by railways and had also endorsed the railway receipt in favour of Naveen Stores, after the loss of which, the first applicant had executed the indemnity bond Ex.B-3 in favour of the consignee and the title of the goods had passed from the first applicant to the consignee Naveen Stores with the result that the first petitioner and the second petitioner cannot maintain the application for compensation. The Tribunal has also relied upon a decision in Yacob Rowther Sons v. Union of India A.I.R 1965 Mad. 162, and dismissed the application.