Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)
Essar Services India Pvt Ltd vs Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd ... on 1 February, 2021 cites

National Shipping Company Of Saudi ... vs Sentrans Industries Limited on 12 January, 2004

& Process Engg. Co. & Anr. vs. Solanki Traders (2008) 2 SCC 302, a judgment of the Division Bench in case in case of National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia vs. Sentrans Industries Limited, Mumbai, 2004 (2) Mh.L.J. 696, a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court Nimbus Communications Ltd. vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India 2013(1) Mh.L.J. 39, a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Adhunik Steels Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese & Minerals (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 125, a judgment delivered by the learned single Judge of this Court in case of Baker Huge Singapore Pte vs. Shiv Vani Oil and Gas Exploration, 2014 SCC Online Bom. 1663 has held that under section 9(i) (ii) (b) of the Arbitration Act, the Court is empowered to pass interim measure to secure the amount in dispute in arbitration which may be in the form of bank guarantee or deposit of money in Court. Such powers of Court can be exercised not only in the hands of the parties to arbitration but also in the hands of third party who has to admittedly pay any amount to the party to the arbitration agreement by directing such third party to deposit the amount on behalf of a party to arbitration agreement in Court.
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 46 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Nimbus Communications Ltd vs Board Of Control For Cricket In India on 3 September, 2015

& Process Engg. Co. & Anr. vs. Solanki Traders (2008) 2 SCC 302, a judgment of the Division Bench in case in case of National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia vs. Sentrans Industries Limited, Mumbai, 2004 (2) Mh.L.J. 696, a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court Nimbus Communications Ltd. vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India 2013(1) Mh.L.J. 39, a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Adhunik Steels Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese & Minerals (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 125, a judgment delivered by the learned single Judge of this Court in case of Baker Huge Singapore Pte vs. Shiv Vani Oil and Gas Exploration, 2014 SCC Online Bom. 1663 has held that under section 9(i) (ii) (b) of the Arbitration Act, the Court is empowered to pass interim measure to secure the amount in dispute in arbitration which may be in the form of bank guarantee or deposit of money in Court. Such powers of Court can be exercised not only in the hands of the parties to arbitration but also in the hands of third party who has to admittedly pay any amount to the party to the arbitration agreement by directing such third party to deposit the amount on behalf of a party to arbitration agreement in Court.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 54 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Baker Hughes Singapore Pte vs Shiv-Vani Oil And Gas Exploration ... on 11 November, 2014

& Process Engg. Co. & Anr. vs. Solanki Traders (2008) 2 SCC 302, a judgment of the Division Bench in case in case of National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia vs. Sentrans Industries Limited, Mumbai, 2004 (2) Mh.L.J. 696, a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court Nimbus Communications Ltd. vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India 2013(1) Mh.L.J. 39, a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Adhunik Steels Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese & Minerals (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 125, a judgment delivered by the learned single Judge of this Court in case of Baker Huge Singapore Pte vs. Shiv Vani Oil and Gas Exploration, 2014 SCC Online Bom. 1663 has held that under section 9(i) (ii) (b) of the Arbitration Act, the Court is empowered to pass interim measure to secure the amount in dispute in arbitration which may be in the form of bank guarantee or deposit of money in Court. Such powers of Court can be exercised not only in the hands of the parties to arbitration but also in the hands of third party who has to admittedly pay any amount to the party to the arbitration agreement by directing such third party to deposit the amount on behalf of a party to arbitration agreement in Court.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 18 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document
1