Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs Adesh Sharma & Ors on 21 March, 2016 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

7. The claimants had proved before the tribunal that the deceased, after retiring from Army service, was working for gain as an Assistant Manager in a private security agency. Though they could not prove the exact emoluments, which he was earning from the said private employment, the MAC. APP. No.418/2010 Page 4 of 6 tribunal assumed it to the extent of ₹3,900/-, it being wages of a skilled worker and added 50% towards future prospects. Having regard to the view taken in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 and Reshma Kumari V. Madan Mohan (2013) 9 SCC 65, this was not correct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013

7. The claimants had proved before the tribunal that the deceased, after retiring from Army service, was working for gain as an Assistant Manager in a private security agency. Though they could not prove the exact emoluments, which he was earning from the said private employment, the MAC. APP. No.418/2010 Page 4 of 6 tribunal assumed it to the extent of ₹3,900/-, it being wages of a skilled worker and added 50% towards future prospects. Having regard to the view taken in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 and Reshma Kumari V. Madan Mohan (2013) 9 SCC 65, this was not correct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 2700 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1