Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (4.63 seconds)
Willard India Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax. (Dy. ... on 27 August, 1996 cites

State Bank Of Travancore vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala on 8 January, 1986

Regarding the disallowance of Rs. 2,99,287 representing the debts due to others but written back in the account books of the assessee in this year, the assessee relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State Bank of Travancore vs. CIT AIR 1958 SC, (1986) 158 ITR 102 (SC) and also the Gujarat High Court decision in Navjeevan Udyog Mandir P. Ltd. vs. CIT (1994) 207 ITR 40 (Guj).
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 520 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document

Navjivan Udyog Mandir (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 3 February, 1994

Regarding the disallowance of Rs. 2,99,287 representing the debts due to others but written back in the account books of the assessee in this year, the assessee relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State Bank of Travancore vs. CIT AIR 1958 SC, (1986) 158 ITR 102 (SC) and also the Gujarat High Court decision in Navjeevan Udyog Mandir P. Ltd. vs. CIT (1994) 207 ITR 40 (Guj).
Gujarat High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 16 - M B Shah - Full Document

Protos Engineer Co. P. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 10 November, 1994

Ltd. (1994) 207 ITR 169 (Cal) and Protos Engg. Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (1995) 211 ITR 919 (Bom). The assessee's head office is situated within Allahabad High Court's jurisdiction. There is no decision of Allahabad High Court cited before us. In the absence of any authority from the jurisdictional High Court, the principle that when there is conflict of judicial opinion on a particular question the decision in favour of the assessee should be preferred has to be followed.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 13 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next