Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Sosamma George vs Idikkula Varghese on 8 April, 2026 cites

S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) By ... vs Jagannath (Dead) By L.Rs. And Others on 27 October, 1993

11. Learned counsel for the defendant relied on the judgment in S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath and Others [1995 KHC 182] which held that a litigant who approaches the court is bound to procude all documents executed which are relevant to the litigation and if withhold a vital document in order to gain advantage, he would be guilty of playing fraud on the court as well as on the opposite party.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1512 - K Singh - Full Document

M.C. Priyamvada vs M.G. Ajayan And Others on 11 August, 2014

7. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants would argue that since the defendant had admitted the signature in Ext.A1 cheque, the burden of proving the transaction he pleaded was on him and having miserably failed to discharge the said burden, the suit ought to have been decreed. Learned counsel also relied on Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the judgments in Priyamvada K. v. M. Rahufina [2024 (1) KHC 245], Parameswaran v. Smitha Suresh [2024 (6) KHC 27] and Rajesh Jain v. Ajay Singh [(2023) 10 SCC 148] to contend that in a case where the cheque and the signature are admitted by the accused, the presumption under Section 118(a) and Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 would operate and the burden shifts to the RFA NO. 463 OF 2005 6 2026:KER:30413 accused to disprove or show the non existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1