cites: 68746191 year: 2003

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)

Kumari Shaima Jafari vs Irphan @ Gulfam & Ors on 11 December, 2012 cites

Narendra Nath Khaware vs Parasnath Khaware And Ors on 17 April, 2003

11. Yet again, in Narendra Nath Khaware v. Parasnath Khavare and Others[5], this Court had the occasion to deal with such a situation. In that context, the Court observed thus: -

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 20 - A Kumar - Full Document

Raj Kishore Jha vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 7 October, 2003

14. This Court, in Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar and others[6] and State of Orissa v. Dhaniram Luhar[7], had held that “reason” is the heartbeat of every conclusion and without the same, it becomes lifeless. It is dangerous to forget that reason is the essential foundation on which a conclusion can be based. Giving reasons for an order is the sacrosanct requirement of law which is the aim of every civilized society. And intellect respects it. It would not be out of place to state here that the reasons in criminal jurisprudence must flow from the material on record and in this regard, a line from Bossuet is worth reproducing: -

Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 347 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Narendra Nath Khaware vs Parasnath Khaware And Ors on 17 April, 2003

Raj Kishore Jha vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 7 October, 2003