Tek Chand vs The High Court Of Judicature F on 18 February, 2011
11. Mr. H. V. Nandwana, Advocate, adopting the arguments of his colleagues, in addition, vehemently argued that the very object of making of adverse remarks would be lost if they are communicated to the Officer concerned after an inordinate delay. That apart, all Reporting Officers, Reviewing Officers and Accepting Officers, have demitted office either because of retirement or otherwise. To reinforce his submissions, reliance has been placed on the opinion in the case of State of Haryana (supra), para no. 13 and 14: Tek Chand Vs. The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur: RLR 1993(2) 91, para no. 12 and 13, and the Instructions regarding the Annual Performance Appraisal, 1976.