Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)

Agrico Engg. Works (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commr. Of C. Ex. on 10 October, 2000

In response to the notice, it was mainl y submitted that facts in the case of Bhalotia Engineering Works Pvt Ltd (supra) are distinguishable because assessee has 3 accepted Share Application Money in cash from directors only and not from any outsiders. Further, the loans have been accepted as genuine even by the Assessing Officer after scrutiny assessment. It was further submitted that Share Application Money is not governed by the definition of deposit as per rule 2(b)(ix) of the Company's (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975, because it clearl y provides that deposits would not include any amount received from person who at the time of receipt was Director or relative to the Director or Member of a company.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Commr. Of C. Ex. vs Swastik Vegetable Oil Products Ltd. on 8 March, 2004

In any case, when different views have been taken by different High Courts, then the decision which is favorable to the assessee has to be adopted and for this proposition he relied on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of C IT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. (1973) 88 ITR 192 (SC) and Podar Cements (P) Ltd. (1997) 226 ITR 625 (SC).
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1