Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)

Sanjay Kumar Rai vs State Of Chhattisgarh 26 Wps/543/2018 ... on 16 January, 2018

Ajay Rai v/s Kashi Yadav So much so since parties in both the suits are different otherwise also the first basic test that both the cases should be between the same parties is also not met herein. I need not dwell further on this point. Nothing has been stated during the course of arguments as to the fate of the said suit or otherwise as to how the said suit had any bearing in the facts of the present case. This issue is decided in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 39 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document

Urmila Devi vs Jai Narayan Rai @ Jay Narayan Yadav on 6 July, 2022

3.1 Defendant in his Written Statement has raised the preliminary objection that the suit is neither maintainable nor sustainable in the eyes of the law as the plaintiff has no locus standi to file the present suit. It is further stated that suit is further not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed owing to the doctrine of res sub judice. It is also stated that wife of the defendant has already filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction against the plaintiff herein i.e. suit bearing No.03/2016 titled as "Urmila Devi vs. Ajay Kumar Rai & Anr." prior to filing of the present suit, in which the plaintiff has already filed Written Statement.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R R Prasad - Full Document
1