Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)

C.C.E., Bhubaneswar-1 vs M/S. Champdany Industries Ltd on 8 September, 2009

In a notice under Section 74 of the JGST Act, the necessary ingredients relating to fraud or willful misstatement of suppression of fact to evade tax have to be impleaded whereas in a notice under Section 73 of the same act the Revenue has to specifically allege the violations or contraventions, which has led to tax not being paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or Input Tax Credit wrongly availed or utilized. It is trite law that unless the foundation of a case is laid down in a show cause notice, the assessee would be precluded from defending the charges in a vague show cause notice. That would entail violation of principles of natural justice. He can only do so, if he is told as to what the charges levelled against him are and the allegations on which such charges are based.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 46 - Full Document

Khem Chand vs The Union Of India And Others on 13 December, 1957

Reliance is placed on the opinion of the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of Khem Chand versus Union of India [AIR 1958 SC 300], which has also been relied upon in the case of Oryx Fisheries P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported in (2010) 13 SCC 427 and profitably quoted in our decision rendered in the case of the same petitioner in W.P (T) No. 2444 of 2021.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 504 - Full Document

Oryx Fisheries Pvt.Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 October, 2010

Reliance is placed on the opinion of the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of Khem Chand versus Union of India [AIR 1958 SC 300], which has also been relied upon in the case of Oryx Fisheries P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported in (2010) 13 SCC 427 and profitably quoted in our decision rendered in the case of the same petitioner in W.P (T) No. 2444 of 2021.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 668 - Full Document
1   2 Next