Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.36 seconds)

General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993

11. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company refers to a three Judge Bench decision of the Supreme Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. v. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 wherein while approving the ratio with regard to future prospects in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. (supra) and relying on General Manag- er, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179 and Abati Bezbaruah v. Dy. Director General, Geological Survey of India & Anr., 2003 (3) SCC 148, the Supreme Court held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 4294 - G N Ray - Full Document

Smt Sarla Dixit & Anr vs Balwant Yadav & Ors on 29 February, 1996

11. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company refers to a three Judge Bench decision of the Supreme Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. v. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 wherein while approving the ratio with regard to future prospects in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. (supra) and relying on General Manag- er, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179 and Abati Bezbaruah v. Dy. Director General, Geological Survey of India & Anr., 2003 (3) SCC 148, the Supreme Court held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 794 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

Santosh Devi vs National Insurance Co.Ltd.& Ors on 23 April, 2012

14. Of course, three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in its later judgment in Rajesh relying on Santosh Devi v. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors., 2012 (6) SCC 421 observed that there would be addition of 30% and 50%, depending upon the age of the deceased, towards future prospects even in the case of self-employed per- sons. It may, however, be noted that in Rajesh, the three Judge Bench decision in Reshma Ku- mari (supra) was not brought to the notice of their Lordships.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 2663 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next