Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (1.26 seconds)

Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 1 August, 2014

15. We are in complete agreement with the contention advanced at the hands of the learned http://www.judis.nic.in Page 17 of 22 CRL.O.P.No.1157 of 2020 counsel for the appellant. We are satisfied, that Section 142(2)(a), amended through the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015, vests jurisdiction for initiating proceedings for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, inter alia, in the territorial jurisdiction of the court, where the cheque is delivered for collection (through an account of the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains an account). We are also satisfied, based on Section 142-A(1) to the effect, that the judgment rendered by this Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod case [Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 9 SCC 129 : (2014) 4 SCC (Civ) 676 : (2014) 3 SCC (Cri) 673] , would not stand in the way of the appellant, insofar as the territorial jurisdiction for initiating proceedings emerging from the dishonour of the cheque in the present case arises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 66 - Cited by 805 - V Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next