Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Dharambir Singh Through L.Rs. And ... vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 April, 2010
While dealing with issue of quashing of FIR on the basis of
compromise a Bench consisting of Five Hon'ble Judges of this Court in
Kulwinder Singh's case (supra) while approving minority view in
Dharambir v. State of Haryana 2005 (3) RCR (Criminal) 426: 2005(2)
Apex Criminal 424: 2005 (2) Law Herald 723 (P&H) (FB), opined as under:-
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shakuntala Sawhney vs Kaushalya Sawhney on 4 April, 1979
It has been observed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Mrs.
Shakuntala Sawhney v. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney (1980)1 SCC 63 that
"the finest Hour of Justice arrives propitiously when parties, despite falling
apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense of fellowship of reunion." The
power to do complete justice is the very essence of every judicial justice
dispensation system. It cannot be diluted by distorted perceptions and is
not a slave to anything, except to the caution and circumspection, the
standards of which the Court sets before it, in exercise of such plenary and
unfettered power inherently vested in it while donning the cloak of
compassion to achieve the ends of justice.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Kulwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 5 December, 2006
For the reasons recorded above and having regard to the
principles laid down by the Five -Judges Bench of this Court in case of
Kulwinder Singh's case (supra), this petition is allowed and impugned
criminal proceedings arising out of FIR No. 119 dated 13.07.2007 as well
as all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
1