Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
Having
regard to the above mentioned observations by the Apex Court in case
of Kalyan Chandra Sarkar (supra) the observations made by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in the above referred decisions, the orders do not help
the accused - application to take his case any further.
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Kajad on 6 September, 2001
In
the decision in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kajad [2001
(7) SC 673], the Apex Court has observed that:-
Pandurang, Tukia And Bhillia vs The State Of Hyderabad on 3 December, 1954
While deciding the cases on facts, more so in criminal cases the
court should bear in mind that each case must rest on its own facts
and the similarity of facts in one case cannot be used to bear in
mind the conclusion of fact in another case (See: Pandurang and Anr.
vs. State of Hyderabad (1955 1 SCR 1083). It is also a well
established principle that while considering the ratio laid down in
one case, the court will have to bear in mind that every judgement
must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved or assumed
to be true. Since the generality of expressions which may be found
therein are not intended to be expositions of the whole of the law,
but are governed and qualified by the particular facts of the case
in which such expressions are to be found. A case is only an
authority for what it actually decides, and not what logically
follows from it."