Gaya Din vs Mata Din And Ors. on 6 July, 1909
It is well settled that if a part of the property is omitted from the plaint altogether in a pre-emption suit, an amendment of the plaint permitting the inclusion of the omitted property would be allowed provided the omission is found to be unintentional (vide Jalal Din v. Qaim Din, 62 Pun R 1914=(AIR 1914 Lah 263); Banta Singh v. Smt. Harbhajan Kaur, 1969-71 Pun LR 862; Deedar Singh v. Dalbir Singh, 1970 Cur LJ 143 (Punj); Teja Singh v. Bhagwan Singh, 1970 Pun LJ 615, and Jarnail Singh v Bahal Singh, Letters Patent Appeal No. 583 of 1969, decided on 23-4-1970 (Punj) by a Division Bench of this Court consisting of Mahajan and Dhillon, JJ.).