Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (1.55 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 342 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Balwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 9 November, 1995
16. The learned Counsel, therefore, submits that in this case also the evidence of PW 3 and 4 before whom the allegeged confessions were made are not reliable. Similarly the conduct of the I.O. also become doubtful and there was no other circumstances to connect the accused with the crime hence the conviction based solely on retracted extra-judicial confession, is not proper and the accused persons are entitled to acquittal, I have given any anxious consideration on the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. On the basis of the law laid down by the Supreme Court as aforementioned the inability of the prosecution to produce reliable and independent corroboration of the alleged confessional statements of the appellants, makes the conviction and sentence of the accused persons illegal.
Sakharam Shankar Bansode vs State Of Maharashtra on 2 April, 1993
14. The Supreme Court in the case of Sakharam Shankar Bansode v. State of Maharashtra has also held that:-