Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.44 seconds)Section 20 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Article 54 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 23 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
His Holiness Acharya Swamiganesh ... vs Shri Sita Ram Thapar on 30 April, 1996
98. The Apex Court in the case of Basant Ram (supra) has held that mere presence at the office of the sub-registrar, unaccompanied by any evidence of financial preparedness such as a demand draft or other supporting documentation cannot suffice. It is not enough to merely state that one is ready and willing to perform his part, but he needs to substantially show that genuine efforts were made in that regard and should have supporting documents such as a demand draft prepared. In the facts of the case, it was held that plaintiffs were not always ready and willing to perform their part of the agreement, which was not supported by their conduct.
Section 22 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Sukhbir Singh & Ors vs Brij Pal Singh & Ors on 10 May, 1996
In Sukhbir Singh v. Brij Pal Singh [(1997) 2 SCC 200] this Court had laid down that law is not in doubt and it is not a condition that the respondents (plaintiffs) should have ready cash with them. It is sufficient for the respondents to establish that they had the capacity to pay the sale consideration. It is not necessary that they should always carry the money with them from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.