Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.33 seconds)
Dr Jitarani Udgata vs Union Of India & Anr. on 17 October, 2022 cites

Ajay Hasia Etc vs Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. Etc on 13 November, 1980

30. On the same day that the decision in Ajay Hasia [Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, (1981) 1 SCC 722 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 258] was pronounced came the decision of Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India [(1981) 1 SCC 449 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 200 : AIR 1981 SC 212] . Here too, the reasoning in Ramana [(1979) 3 SCC 489 : AIR 1979 SC 1628] was followed and Bharat Petroleum Corporation was held to be a "State" within the "enlarged meaning of Article 12". SabhajitTewary [(1975) 1 SCC 485 : 1975 SCC (L&S) 99 : (1975) 3 SCR 616 : AIR 1975 SC 1329] was criticised and distinguished as being limited to the facts of the case. It was said : (SCC p. 473, para 43) "The rulings relied on are, unfortunately, in the province of Article 311 and it is clear that a body may be „State‟ under Part III but not under Part XIV. Ray, C.J., rejected the argument that merely because the Prime Minister was the President or that the other members were appointed and removed by Government did not make the Society a „State‟.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1343 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979

With great respect, we agree that in the absence of the other features elaborated in Airport Authority case [(1979) 3 SCC 489 : AIR 1979 SC 1628] the composition of the governing body alone may not be decisive. The laconic discussion and the limited ratio in Tewary [(1975) 1 SCC 485 : 1975 SCC (L&S) 99 : (1975) 3 SCR 616 : AIR 1975 SC 1329] hardly help either side here.""
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 2519 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Som Prakash Rekhi vs Union Of India & Anr on 13 November, 1980

30. On the same day that the decision in Ajay Hasia [Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, (1981) 1 SCC 722 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 258] was pronounced came the decision of Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India [(1981) 1 SCC 449 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 200 : AIR 1981 SC 212] . Here too, the reasoning in Ramana [(1979) 3 SCC 489 : AIR 1979 SC 1628] was followed and Bharat Petroleum Corporation was held to be a "State" within the "enlarged meaning of Article 12". SabhajitTewary [(1975) 1 SCC 485 : 1975 SCC (L&S) 99 : (1975) 3 SCR 616 : AIR 1975 SC 1329] was criticised and distinguished as being limited to the facts of the case. It was said : (SCC p. 473, para 43) "The rulings relied on are, unfortunately, in the province of Article 311 and it is clear that a body may be „State‟ under Part III but not under Part XIV. Ray, C.J., rejected the argument that merely because the Prime Minister was the President or that the other members were appointed and removed by Government did not make the Society a „State‟.
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 406 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next