Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.64 seconds)Babu Bhagwan Din vs Gir Har Saroop on 10 October, 1939
30. Mr. Goyal cited certain observations of the Judicial Committee in Babu Bhagwan Din v. Gir Har Saroop . In support of his contention that the mere fact that the property descended from Guru to Chela and that there was a grant from the Rulers from time to lime for the Temple, is not sufficient to show that it was a public endowment. This is stated only to be rejected. The facts of that case were entirely different. The points of distinction have been fully brought out by the High Court and we do not intend to burden this Judgment by a repetition of the same.
U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952
Section 209 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 210 in U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 [Entire Act]
1