Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.39 seconds)Section 58 in The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Md. Sharafat Ali @ Sarafat Ali & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 14 September, 2016
(In C.W.J.C. No.17165 of 2019, order dated 14.1.2020)
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7551 of 2020 dt.05-11-2020
15/24
Learned counsel for the petitioner invites our
attention to our earlier order dated 09.01.2020 passed in
CWJC No. 20598 of 2019, titled as Md. Shaukat Ali Vs.
The State of Bihar& Ors., and wants the petition to be
disposed of in terms thereof.
The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016
Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950
Section 58 in Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Laxman Das @ Lakshman Ravidas vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 February, 2018
(v) judgement dated 12.02.2018 passed
in CWJC No.2470 of 2018 titled as Laxman Das @
Lakshman Ravidas Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.;
Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Umesh Prasad Sah & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 26 June, 2018
Patna High Court CWJC No.7551 of 2020 dt.05-11-2020
20/24
In Umesh Sah (supra), this Court had clarified
that the expression "reasonable delay" under Section 58
of Chapter 6 of the Act has to be construed to be 'not
more than three months'.
Diwakar Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 December, 2017
(i) Judgement dated 22.03.2018 passed
in CWJC No.5049 of 2018, titled as Diwakar Kumar
Singh versus The State of Bihar & Ors.;