Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.75 seconds)Ram Sarup Gupta (Dead) By Lrs vs Bishun Narain Inter College & Ors on 8 April, 1987
In the decision reported as 1987 (2) SCC 555 Ram
Sarup Gupta (Dead) by LRs Vs. Bishun Narain Inter College &
Ors., highlighting the object and purpose of pleadings, in para
6, it was observed as under:-
Pandu Dhondi Yerudkar And Anr. vs Ananda Krishna Patil on 12 April, 1973
7. With reference to the decisions reported as 1974
(76) BLR 368 Pandu Dhongi Yerudkar Vs. Ananda Krishna Patil
and Air 1982 Bom.
Nilesh Construction Company And Anr. vs Gangubai And Ors. on 26 April, 1982
491 M/s. Nilesh Construction Company &
Anr. Vs. Mrs. Gangubai & Ors., in the decision reported as AIR
1999 SC 1464 D.M.Deshpande & Ors. Vs. Janardhan Kashinath
KAdam & Ors., in para 9 and 11, the Supreme Court
highlighted that „a vague plea does not justify an issue being
RFA (OS) 30/2011 Page 3 of 10
framed ‟and further, where no material in support of a plea has
been set up anywhere in any form, the Court would be justified
in not settling an issue requiring the parties to traverse the
torturous path of a trial.
Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors vs Nirmala Devi & Ors on 4 July, 2011
In the latest pronouncement
on the subject, being the decision reported as 2011 (6) SCALE
677 Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. Vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.,
highlighting how frivolous litigations are being instituted and
how these frivolous litigations are choking the stream of
justice, with reference to the importance of pleadings, in sub-
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 48 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Shri D.M.Deshpande & Ors vs Shri Janardhan Kashinath Kadam (Dead) ... on 12 November, 1998
491 M/s. Nilesh Construction Company &
Anr. Vs. Mrs. Gangubai & Ors., in the decision reported as AIR
1999 SC 1464 D.M.Deshpande & Ors. Vs. Janardhan Kashinath
KAdam & Ors., in para 9 and 11, the Supreme Court
highlighted that „a vague plea does not justify an issue being
RFA (OS) 30/2011 Page 3 of 10
framed ‟and further, where no material in support of a plea has
been set up anywhere in any form, the Court would be justified
in not settling an issue requiring the parties to traverse the
torturous path of a trial.
1