Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)
V Prema vs Comptroller And Auditor-General Of ... on 16 November, 2018 cites

State Of Bihar And Ors vs Ramjee Prasad And Ors on 11 April, 1990

e) State of Bihar vs Ramiee Prasad 1990 (3) SCC 368, Union of India and Anr vs Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal 1994 (4) SCC 212 (Para 5), Rama Rao and Ors vs All India Backward class bank employees welfare Association and ors 2004 (2) SCC 76 (para 31), University Grants Commission vs Sadhana Choudhary and ors 1996 (10) SCC $36 ete f} Divisional Manger, Aravali Golf Club and Anr Vs chander Hass and Anr 2008 (3) 3 JT 221 and in Govt. of A.P vs Smt P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (2) 8 UT 639 es
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 240 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Union Of India vs Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal on 4 May, 1994

e) State of Bihar vs Ramiee Prasad 1990 (3) SCC 368, Union of India and Anr vs Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal 1994 (4) SCC 212 (Para 5), Rama Rao and Ors vs All India Backward class bank employees welfare Association and ors 2004 (2) SCC 76 (para 31), University Grants Commission vs Sadhana Choudhary and ors 1996 (10) SCC $36 ete f} Divisional Manger, Aravali Golf Club and Anr Vs chander Hass and Anr 2008 (3) 3 JT 221 and in Govt. of A.P vs Smt P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (2) 8 UT 639 es
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 243 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

University Grants Commission vs Sadhana Chaudhary & Ors on 17 September, 1996

e) State of Bihar vs Ramiee Prasad 1990 (3) SCC 368, Union of India and Anr vs Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal 1994 (4) SCC 212 (Para 5), Rama Rao and Ors vs All India Backward class bank employees welfare Association and ors 2004 (2) SCC 76 (para 31), University Grants Commission vs Sadhana Choudhary and ors 1996 (10) SCC $36 ete f} Divisional Manger, Aravali Golf Club and Anr Vs chander Hass and Anr 2008 (3) 3 JT 221 and in Govt. of A.P vs Smt P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (2) 8 UT 639 es
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 217 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Government Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors vs Smt. P. Laxmi Devi on 25 February, 2008

e) State of Bihar vs Ramiee Prasad 1990 (3) SCC 368, Union of India and Anr vs Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal 1994 (4) SCC 212 (Para 5), Rama Rao and Ors vs All India Backward class bank employees welfare Association and ors 2004 (2) SCC 76 (para 31), University Grants Commission vs Sadhana Choudhary and ors 1996 (10) SCC $36 ete f} Divisional Manger, Aravali Golf Club and Anr Vs chander Hass and Anr 2008 (3) 3 JT 221 and in Govt. of A.P vs Smt P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (2) 8 UT 639 es
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 725 - M Katju - Full Document

Union Of India vs S. R. Dhingra And Others on 14 December, 2007

g) Union of India vs $8.R Dhingra and ors (2008) 2 SCC 229 The respondents contend that based on the above judgments it cannot be said that fixation of cut off date of 1.1.2006 for the purpose of extending retire! benefits is arbitrary and tt is permissible for the Govt. to fix cut off date for introducing any new pension /retirement scheme or for discontinuing of any existing scheme. Thus the challenge made by the applicants based upon the MERS PE AD OE LR judgment in D.S.Nakara that pre -2006 retirees should be extended the same pensionary benefits as that of post 2006 retirees cannot be accepted. Moreover there are two different schemes for the pre 2006 and the post 2006 retirees.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 64 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next