Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.30 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in The Lokpal And Lokayuktas Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Nasir Ahmad And Ors. vs King-Emperor on 12 May, 1927
In Nazir
Ahmad v. King Emperor, 1936 SCC OnLine
PC 41, it has been held as follows: (SCC
OnLine PC)
"... The rule which applies is a
different and not less well
recognised rule--namely, that
where a power is given to do a
certain thing in a certain way the
thing must be done in that way or
not at all."
Kavi Arora vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India on 14 September, 2022
10. Per contra, learned counsel for the learned Lokpal would
contend that the Impugned Notices is merely in the nature of a show-
cause notice and does not determine any rights of the parties. Reliance
would be placed upon the decisions of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in
Kavi Arora v. SEBI14 and CCE v. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd.15, to urge
that a writ petition challenging interlocutory or show-cause order is
not maintainable.
The Principal Commissioner Of Service ... vs M/S. R.R. Global Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., ... on 31 August, 2016
10. Per contra, learned counsel for the learned Lokpal would
contend that the Impugned Notices is merely in the nature of a show-
cause notice and does not determine any rights of the parties. Reliance
would be placed upon the decisions of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in
Kavi Arora v. SEBI14 and CCE v. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd.15, to urge
that a writ petition challenging interlocutory or show-cause order is
not maintainable.
Swatantar Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 March, 1997
"26. Relying upon Nazir Ahmad case [AIR 1936 PC 253
(2)] and applying the principles laid down
in Taylor v. Taylor [(1876) 1 Ch D 426] this Court
in Singhara Singh case [AIR 1964 SC 358] held: (AIR p.
K.C. Sareen vs C.B.I., Chandigarh on 2 August, 2001
30. It has also been held by the Apex Court that the
efficiency in public service would improve only when the
public servant devotes his sincere attention and does the
duty diligently, truthfully, honestly and devotes himself
assiduously to the performance of the duties of his post.
[Refer to:-- Swatantar Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997)
4 SCC 14; K.C. Sareen v. CBI, (2001) 6 SCC
584; Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh, (2012)
3 SCC 64; State of Gujarat v. Justice R.A.
Mehta(Retd.), (2013) 3 SCC 1].