Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)
J.Merula vs The Commissioner on 31 January, 2012 cites

Janata Dal vs H.S. Chowdhary And Ors. on 28 August, 1992

JANATA DAL VS. H.S.CHOWDHARY [1992 (2) SCC 305] "109. It is thus clear that only a person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest in the proceeding of PIL will alone have a locus standi and can approach the court to wipe out the tears of the poor and needy, suffering from violation of their fundamental rights, but not a person for personal gain or private profit or political motive or any oblique consideration. Similarly, a vexatious petition under the colour of PIL brought before the court for vindicating any personal grievance, deserves rejection at the threshold."
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 1333 - S R Pandian - Full Document

The Perundurai Citizens Welfare ... vs The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board on 20 December, 2004

THE PERUNDURAI CITIZENS WELFARE SOCIETY VS. TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD [2005 (1) CTC 721] "25.As already stated above, these days "public interest litigation" has become largely "private interest litigation" for ulterior motives, or is misused by business rivals, or persons who sponsor such litigation from behind with mala fide intentions. We cannot appreciate these tactics. The docket of the Court is already overful with arrears. The Court should discourage this kind of motivated litigation, which only adds to its burden."
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 6 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next