Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)
Sharanayya S/O. Hanamayya @ Shantayya ... vs M/S Continental Carrier Of India on 1 March, 2023
cites
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 134 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 158 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Lehru And Ors on 28 February, 2003
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
35. Insofar as monthly income, though
claimants have stated that deceased Sri.
Hanamayya, aged 48 years working as agriculturist
was earning Rs.2,50,000/- p.a., tribunal considered
it at Rs.6,000/- notionally. Though same is not
substantiated. As per norms adopted by Karnataka
Legal Services Committee, for settlement of cases
before Lok-adalat, notional income for year 2014 is
assessed at Rs.7,500/-. Therefore, Rs.7,500/- has
to be considered. Claimants are wife and four minor
children i.e. five dependents. Deceased was self-
employed. Therefore, as per ratio in National
Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi 3, multiplier
applicable would be '13', addition of future
prospects at '25%' and deduction towards personal
expenses would be '1/4'. Thus, loss of dependency
would be:
1