Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)Minor P. Rajendran vs State Of Madras & Ors on 17 January, 1968
The decision in Minor P. Rajendran's case C) was
distinguished on the ground that in that case the
classification made district wise had been considered to
possess no reasonable relation with the object sought to be
achieved.
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Chithra Ghosh & Another vs Union Of India And Others on 25 April, 1969
It was also observed in Chitra Ghosh's case (2).
"It is the Central Government which bears the financial
burden of running the medical college. It is for it to lay
down the criteria for eligibility. From the very nature of
things it is not possible to throw the admission open to
students from all over the country. The Government cannot
be denied the right to decide from what sources the
admission will be made. That essentially is a question of
policy and depends inter alia on an overall assessment and
survey of the requirements of residents of particular
territories and other categories of persons for whom it is
essential to provide facilities for medical education. If
the sources are properly classified whether on territorial,
geographical or other reasonable basis it is not for the
courts to interfere with the manner and method of making the
classification."
D. P. Joshi vs The State Of Madhya Bharat Andanother on 27 January, 1955
in D. P. Joshi v. The State of Madhya Bharat and Another
this Court had while upholding by majority the rules, made
by the State of Madhya Bharat, for admission to the Mahatma
Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, charging capitation
fee from non-Madhya Bharat students laid down that in those
,rules the word "domicile" was used in its popular sense
conveying the idea of residence. Venkatarama Ayyar, J.,
speaking for the majority said:
Article 63 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1