Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)
Ajay Prakash Patel vs Prescribed Authority Cum Sub ... on 17 January, 2025 cites

Pramila Bai W/O Surendra Singh, ... vs Sub-Divisional Officer And Ors. on 8 March, 1999

The judgment of Pramila Bai versus Sub Divisional Officer, Bareli & Others (supra) relied upon by learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is distinguishable on its own facts and has no application to the facts & circumstances of the present case especially because Hon'ble Division Bench i n Pramila Bai versus Sub Divisional Officer, Bareli & Others (supra) has not taken into consideration the provisions contained in Sections 6 & 7 of the General Clauses Act, 1957.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - D Misra - Full Document

Shree Satya Narain Tulsi Manas Mandir ... vs Workman Compensation ... on 26 May, 2006

The law laid down by the Division Bench of this High Court in Satya Narayan versus Additional Commissioner, Ujjain & Others 2008 (1) M.P.LJ. 505 provided that the day on which the election was held to be excluded for computing the period of limitation. In that case, the election was held on January 29, 2005. The respondent No.2 was declared as elected member of the Jila Panchayat. An election petition was maintainable within a period of thirty days. The election petitioner filed election petition on February 28, 2005. As per the provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1957, the day on which the election was held on January 29, 2005 to be excluded for computing the period of limitation. The election petition had been filed within the period of limitation. Even otherwise, it is fairly informed by learned counsel for the parties that February 27, 2005 was a Sunday and the election petition had been filed on the next opening day i.e February 28, 2005, therefore, the election petition was treated to be within limitation.
Allahabad High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 3 - S N Srivastava - Full Document
1