Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.54 seconds)Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ashutosh Kumar Jha & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 4 October, 2016
The learned counsel relying upon the aforesaid judgment rendered in the
case of Ashutosh Kumar Jha (supra) has tried to impress upon this Court that the
Commission has always been following the Rule of qualifying 10 per cent of the
appearing candidates in the Preliminary Examination, for the purposes of
appearing in the Mains Examination.
Sanjay Kumar Rai vs State Of Chhattisgarh 26 Wps/543/2018 ... on 16 January, 2018
37. So far as the last submission advanced on behalf of the non -selectees is
concerned, it is to be stated that this Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar vs.
B.P.S.C. (supra) in paragraph 26 observed as follows:
Ravindra Kumar Singh vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
In the case of Rajesh Kumar* (supra), relied upon by learned counsel
for the petitioners, the Supreme Court, instead of disturbing the process
of selection, had directed re-evaluation of answer sheets on the basis of
the correct model answers as suggested by the experts.
Article 320 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Harla vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 September, 1951
In Harla v. The State of Rajasthan [AIR 1951 SC 467] this Court
held: ".... Natural justice requires that before a law can become
operative it must be promulgated or published. It must be broadcast
in some civilized11way so that all men may know what it is or, at the
very least, there must be some special rule or regulation or
customary channel by or through which such knowledge can be
acquired with the exercise of due and reasonable diligence. The
thought that a decision reached in the secret recesses of a chamber
to which the public have no access and to which even their
accredited representatives have no access and of which they can
normally know nothing, can nevertheless affect their lives, liberty
and property by the mere passing of a Resolution without anything
more is abhorrent to 11civilized man. It shocks his conscience. In the
absence therefore of any law, rule, regulation or custom, we hold
that a law cannot come into being in this way. Promulgation or
publication of some reasonable sort is essential."
State Of Maharashtra vs Mayer Hans George on 24 August, 1964
17. It will be clear from the law laid down by this Court that where the
law prescribes the mode of publication of the law to become
operative, the law must be published in that mode only, but where
the mode of publication of the law is not prescribed by the law, such
law should be published in some usual or recognized mode to bring
it to the knowledge of all persons concerned. In the present case, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.16241 of 2017 dt.10-05-2018
25 / 32
contention of the appellants before the Tribunal or the High Court
was not that the Government Order in G.O.Ms. Nos. 35 and 51 that
the amendment to Rule 2 of the Forest Service Rules would have
retrospective effect from 08.04.1986 was never made known by
any reasonable mode, but that it was not published in the Official
Gazette.
Jaswant Singh Mathura Singh And Anr vs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation And ... on 1 October, 1991
―10. It is within the discretion of the Commission to act according to the
powers given under Article 320 of the Constitution (See Yasbant
Singh Mathura Singh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, (1992)
Suppl.
1