Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.18 seconds)
Eastern Coal Co. Ltd. vs Sunil Kumar Roy on 7 February, 1968 cites

Dawsons Bank Limited vs Nippon Menkwa Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan ... on 21 February, 1935

The plaintiff company is yet to be dissolved. Therefore, the plaintiff company qua juristic person still goes strong. And the present suit is just by such a one. Why amend then? And what will you amend? The plaint by the company, before the com-mencement of the voluntary liquidation, remains just that plaint, after such commencement, without needing any amendment anywhere. The only difference, it makes, is that the liquidators shall have carriage of the suit, and not the Board of Directors, whose powers are no more. That the liquidators may very well do, without any amendment of the plaint -- a plaint by the company as much before the commencement of liquidation as after it. To quote only a little from the judgment of Lord Russell of Killowen in Dawson's Bank, Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushiki Kaisha :
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 91 - Full Document
1   2 Next