Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.69 seconds)Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Nelson Fernandes And Ors vs Special Land Acquisition ... on 2 March, 2007
21. Further, in Nelson Fernades vs. Special Land
rt
Acquisition Officer 2007(9) SCC 447 while dealing with
the case where the land was acquired for laying a
Railway line, the Court held that no deduction by way of
development charges was permissible as there was no
question of any development thereof.
Union Of India vs Harinder Pal Singh & Ors on 26 October, 2005
and relied upon by this Court in Executive Engineer &
Anr. vs . Dilla Ram {Latest HLJ 2008 HP 1007} and relying
upon the decision of the Apex Court in Harinder Pal Singh
(supra) , wherein the market value of the land under
of
acquisition situated in five different villages was assessed
uniformly, irrespective of its nature and quality, also
awarded compensation on uniform rates.
Atma Singh (Died) Through Lrs. & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 7 December, 2007
The existing amenities like, water, electricity, possibility
of their further extension, whether near about Town is
developing or has prospect of development have to be
taken into consideration. (Atma Singh and others v. State
of Haryana and another (2008) 2 SCC 568).
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005
of
per bigha (`20,000/- per biswa) and can be relied upon in
view of Pramod Gupta (supra).
Suresh Kumar vs Town Improvement Trust, Bhopal on 3 March, 1989
In Suresh Kumar v. Town Improvement Trust,
Bhopal [(1989) 2 SCC 329], the Apex Court has held that
while determining the market value of the land acquired,
rt
it has to be correctly determined and paid so that there is
neither unjust enrichment on the part of the acquirer nor
undue deprivation on the part of the owner.